Sunday, June 08, 2008

The demise of secular dogma

"These people are so scared of public opinion they are willing to set in stone the right to ignore it. Freedom requires the governing elite to be held to account. They must be getting very worried if they are enacting such dictatorial powers for themselves." Thus comments Nigel Farage, the leader of the UK Independence Party, on the European Parliaments attempts to prevent Euro-sceptic members from organising themselves and rightly calls the EU mindset arrogant and anti-democratic. What he fails to perceive in his criticism, however, is that this arrogance and intolerance was not invented by European bureaucrats or even Communist commissars before them. This arrogance is a key feature of secular dogma of which Muslims have been at the receiving end for decades due to practising and holding on to their beliefs more tightly than those who still call themselves Christians.

In Germany and France "enlightenment" sinks to the depth of judging a Muslim woman on the basis of whether she wears a piece of cloth on her head or not and denying her access to education or public office if she does. The showcase of secularism, however, is Turkey, where European powers conspired through the Masonic and crypto-Jewish Young Turk movement to unseat the Muslim caliphate and outlaw religious interference in politics. The movers behind the European super-state are as weary of Turkey as they are of the Euro-sceptics amongst their midst; neither can be trusted because of the "public opinion" factor. Euro-sceptics in many European countries are calling for the people to have a say through referendums on a proposed European constitution, common foreign policy, or joint armed forces, and whenever the people were given a democratic chance to voice their opinion they clearly rejected what their masters in Brussels had in mind for them. Hence, if the people are not mature enough to agree to what the unelected European Commission proposes, they must be denied the right to express their views altogether. In European double-speak this is called democracy in action.

In Turkey, likewise, the people never abandoned Islam and it keeps making a come-back. Over and over again those wanting to reform the fundamentalist secularism of Turkey into a proper democracy where Muslims, after all constituting the majority of the population, also can have their aspirations realised, are being outlawed. Whenever a party with Islamic leanings obtains a majority and enters government, the courts and the military try to declare it illegal and in violation of the secular constitution. In addition, they jail politicians who do not agree with them for their opinions. The Turkish constitutional court has just overturned a law passed by parliament which would have allowed Muslim girls to enter university wearing a scarf, and there is talk once more of banning the ruling AK party which only a year ago had won such a strong mandate during elections that European governments must be rightly worried, since their own popular support is forever diminishing.

In a similar show of desperation the secularists have passed a 3-year jail sentence on Adnan Oktar, known around the globe under his pen name Harun Yayha, for dearing to successfully demolish Darwin's theory of evolution as well as exposing Freemasonry. Likewise, European countries regularly jail "revisionists" who dear wanting to subject some of the "founding myths of Israeli politics" (Roger Garaudy), which tirelessly propagated through the official version of the "Jewish Holocaust", to a measure of scientific scrutiny. The "freedom of speech" argument regularly used when it comes to the right to insult what Muslims hold sacred (e.g. when defending Rushdie's or a Danish cartoonist's right to insult, see response in Satanic Voices Ancient and Modern), is conveniently forgotten whenever secular fundamentalist dogma is being attacked. After all, it is the nature of dogma that it must not be questioned. History, however, teaches us that a false dogma cannot be upheld by legislation and court sanctions. Ordaining the earth to be flat and punishing any expression of doubt that it might not be still does not make it so. This is why our rulers are "scared", as Farage put it. They know they are fighting a losing battle, for the truth will out.

8 Comments:

At 10 June 2008 at 03:50, Anonymous Anonymous said...

People of good will, people of honor are never supportive of suppression of speech in terms of historical enquiry. Yet as pointed out honest scholars are regularly imprisoned for scholastic research which is devastating to the Big Brother propaganda.

I do not think we receive an honest education in the West, who of us was taught at university that Kemal Attaturk was a crypto-Jew? None of us, it is only by serendipity and the brave and courageous revisionist historians that facts such as these are brought forth. How can we make informed decisions if critical information is deliberately withheld?

How many Americans realize that their own tax dollars were sent to Israel then funneled back to a lobby to shape the American government in the mold best suited to the machinations of the Zionists?
former WhiteHouse official Ann Lewis as quoted by the Washington Post:
"The role of the president of the United States is to support the decisions that are made by the people of Israel."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/17/AR2008031702440.html
The Audacity of Chutzpah
By Dana Milbank
Tuesday, March 18, 2008; Page A02

The power of the Jewish Lobby in the United States:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0512/p15s01-wmgn.html
tp://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html

Revisionist Victims of the New Inquistion:
http://www.zundelsite.org/english/debate/victims/index.html

 
At 10 June 2008 at 11:44, Anonymous Anonymous said...

As far as I know, Adnan Oktar is convicted because of being a blackmailer. See the Wikipedia-article about him.

 
At 10 June 2008 at 11:51, Blogger Mustaqim said...

...or allegedly being a blackmailer, since these allegations surface and are then withdrawn or thrown out. Character assassination is part of the arsenal of the political establishment in trying to silence opposition. The same happened with the two brothers shot by police in a bungled anti-terror raid in East London: since no other charges would stick the police put out the story that they found child pornography on their computer. This sent the media into a frenzy. However, it wasn't headline news when the allegations were subsequently withdrawn as unsubstantiated.

 
At 11 June 2008 at 23:06, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know. I remember the time when Mr. Oktar slandered biologists as "Maoists", just because they taught evolution.

Slander and Character Assasination are very dirty tricks.

 
At 16 June 2008 at 08:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think crypto-Jew case is exaggerated in Turkey. This serves to the interests of the real Crypto-Jews. They pretend to be more powerful than they really are and they spread the Crypto-Jews news to make their case. They try to affiliate all the big names with crypto-Jewishness. Here in Turkey even the president Abdullah Gul and the PM Tayyip Erdogan have been called crypto-Jews and there are books titled as ''The son of the Moses:Tayyip Erdogan.'' which claims that he has a Jewish backround and this is absolutely nonsense.

 
At 26 July 2008 at 08:17, Anonymous Anonymous said...

,there's not one single evidence showing that adnan oktar is guilty. If you check the site http://www.bav-savunma.org/ you will find out how unlawfully he was given the sentence. By the way, the jurisdiction process continues and the verdict is on the appeal at the supreme court of appeals. Everybody knows that he is not guilty. Even the prosecutor. The prosecutor stated that there was no evidence showing that he is guilty, and so he should be acquitted.

 
At 30 July 2008 at 04:27, Anonymous JakeTheZioist said...

Hey, where did you learn to hate jews, from your German ancestry or your Muslim faith. Like most Jew hating cretins, you seem to link everything back to the Jews, or Ziionists. You are a fascist pig in your heart, that is why you chose Islam, the only religion that kills people that try to leave it.

 
At 30 July 2008 at 08:44, Blogger Mustaqim said...

I don't believe in censorship, so the above comment is published to show the level of sophistication and civilisation of the protagonists of Zionism.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home