Zionism and Judaism – two sides of the same coin?
Critics of Zionism and its excesses are usually keen to
stress that their criticism is not aimed at Judaism as a religion but at
Zionism as a racist and supremacist political movement. This claim of the two
being diametrically opposed to each other is eloquently expressed by Hajo Meyer
in a video interview with David Zlutnick,
quoted approvingly at electronic intifada[1]:
“Zionism and Judaism are contrary to each other.
Because Judaism is universal and humane, and Zionism is exactly the opposite.
It is very narrow, very nationalistic, racist, colonialist, and all this. There
is no ‘National Judaism’. There is Zionism and there is Judaism, and they are
completely different.”
However, this distinction is not always as clear-cut as its
supporters would like to assert. Rather, Zionism is a product of Judaism and
would not exist without it. In some ways, their relationship is like that of a
worn-out marriage in which the partners are no longer particularly attracted to
each other, yet do not wish to divorce due to the benefits of retaining the
union. Or, maybe more aptly, Zionism is the prodigal son of Judaism who often
embarrasses his parents, yet they cannot get themselves to disown him.
For sure, there are critics of Zionism within Judaism.
Amongst them Neturei Karta, a Hassidic Jewish movement who take issue, however,
not with the idea of Zion or Jerusalem as the centre of the world but with the premature
timing of the Zionist project: “the Torah forbids us to end the exile and
establish a state and army until the Holy One, blessed He, in His Glory and
Essence will redeem us.”[2]
Of the many others who think the Zionist project “unwise”, Edward Corrigan
gives a long list.[3] But altogether there are
very few Jews outspoken enough to expose the bigotry of the Zionist project
publicly, such as Noam Chomsky, Norman Finkelstein, Israel Shahak or Israel
Shamir, and on the whole they are disliked and ostracised by their fellow Jews
due to their apparent lack of family loyalty.
In many ways, Zionism is a natural extension of Judaism,
restoring to the wandering Jews the notion of a homeland coupled with political
influence. Its bold supremacism mirrors the ordinary Jewish elitism derived
from a self-perception as the Chosen People. The Talmud as the authoritative
Jewish interpretation of scripture abounds in differentiation between Jews and
Gentiles, with the former being given clear preference over the latter. A
bizarre aberration of this attitude occurs when secular Zionists want to claim
God’s special favours whilst at the same time seeing no need to believe in Him
or act upon His commandments.
When Jews speak out against injustices visited upon non-Jews
in Palestine, they frequently don’t do so because of a belief that Palestinians
should have the same human rights as Israeli Jews – hardly any of them supports
a single-state solution with equal rights for everyone –, but because they
sense that the unbridled aggressive arrogance of the protagonists of Zionism
will damage their overall reputation and standing in a world where Jews still
remain a minority in many places and depend on the good-will of their majority
host communities. They are also worried about the moral fall-out regarding the
future legitimacy of the Zionist state. In the words of Uri Avnery: “What will
be seared into the consciousness of the world will be the image of Israel as a
blood-stained monster, ready at any moment to commit war crimes and not
prepared to abide by any moral restraints. This will have severe consequences
for our long-term future, our standing in the world, our chance of achieving
peace and quiet. In the end, this war is a crime against ourselves too, a crime
against the State of Israel.”[4]
Naturally, whilst being a critic of Israeli military tactics, he opposes calls
for a boycott of the country in response.[5]
Whilst the dream of Zion is as old as the diaspora and there
were earlier attempts to exploit Jewish identification with the Holy Land for
the benefit of British Imperial designs against the threat of continental
progress under Napoleon, Theodor Herzl and Benjamin Disraeli are recognised as
the founders of political Zionism as a distinct movement.[6]
Herzl is also said to have been the original author of the “Protocols of the
Elders of Zion”[7]. The Zionists aspirations
for political power were not immediately shared widely amongst European Jews
and their ideas of setting up an exclusive Jewish state were initially
ridiculed and rejected, but gradually gained currency, not least due to waves
of anti-Semitism purposefully promoted and aided by the Zionists.[8]
In his “Diaries”, Herzl noted: “The anti-Semites will become our most
dependable friends and the anti-Semitic countries our allies”. And Israel’s
first prime minister David Ben-Gurion went on record saying: “If I knew that it would be possible to save
all the children in Germany by bringing them over to England, and only half of
them to Israel, then I would opt for the second alternative. For we must weigh not
only the life of these children but also the history of the people of Israel.”[9], showing his open contempt
for Jewish lives in furthering Zionist political ambitions.
Neither Herzl nor Disraeli, or any of the prominent Zionists
of the founding years of the state of Israel, were defenders of the Judaism of
the Torah. But that does not mean they weren’t proper Jews. Most gentiles do
not realise that the God of the Bible is not the only God holding sway over
Jews in their synagogues. During their Babylonian captivity, Jews also learned
the dark arts of occult mysticism and magic which they developed into the
Kabbalah, in which all reality emerges from Zion, and the God of their belief
system is no other than the antagonist of the Biblical deity – Lucifer.[10]
He is the free spirit who liberates man from the shackles imposed by God and
the restrictions of a moral code, thus enabling man to become god-like himself
through enlightenment. It is this other god in whose service Jews became
prominently involved in freemasonry with its references to the temple of
Solomon in Jerusalem and in revolutionary movements as well as licentious movements
to undermine public morality, such as the one preached by Sabbatai Zevi. And it
is this aspect of Judaism, the racist elitism without further need for God and
His commandments, which gave birth to political secular Zionism.
This mindset also accounts for Israel’s lack of restraint in
suppressing actual and perceived opposition. The most recent assaults on Gaza
were notable by their brutality with the full weight of a sophisticated and
well equipped army having been brought down indiscriminately on a defenceless
population. But they were no isolated occurrences as earlier massacres, such as
Shabra and Shatila, testify. In these incidents we see the destructive combination
of superiority complex and lack of moral constraint by which Zionism is so
often characterised.
Whilst one might expect that Torah Jews, who may well be
repulsed by such atrocities, would see reason not only to distance themselves
from the worst of these crimes against humanity but outright disown their
Kabbalistic brethren, this rarely happens, because Judaism is not merely seen
as a religion but also as a race which they all share in spite of their
differences in beliefs and practice. The chosen people thus are no longer
chosen because of religious observance but because of the superiority of their
bloodline. The accusation of Israel being a racist apartheid regime is
therefore not merely polemic but supported by the very foundations of the state
of Israel.
This multiple personality complex of Jewish identity lies at
the heart of why such apparently disparate people continue to stick together in
the face of criticism, however justified. It is this unity which does not
permit us to separate Zionism and Judaism as distinct, albeit interrelated,
systems. Amongst themselves, Jews may dispute the wisdom or otherwise of the
Zionist project, but vis-à-vis the wider world, generally perceived as hostile,
they are two sides of the same coin.
When we perceive the origins of Zionism in this deviant
occult strand of Judaism, we also gain an understanding of such apparent
contradictions as both Herzl’s and Hitler’s almost identical beliefs on racial
purity and shared love for Wagner[11],
the collusion between the Nazi and Zionist movements in the creation of
anti-semitism and transfer of Jewish people from Europe to Palestine[12],
and the hand of British foreign policy in recruiting both of these charismatic
proponents of their respective racist ideologies from within the intellectual
left-over of the collapsed and decadent Hapsburg empire in Vienna for the
purpose of bringing about the new dawn of global domination by Britain in an
age where steel and oil threatened the natural advantage of the hitherto
unrivalled sea power. Zionism always has been and remains a very British
god-child and a testimony to the influence of Sabbatean Judaism on the British
ruling classes. This is perfectly epitomised in Blake’s hymn Jerusalem having
almost become a rival national anthem for the United Kingdom.
Hence, in the metaphor of Zionism and Judaism as two sides
of the same coin we find that the Zionist side of the coin has become the more
recognisable one and the Judaic side has worn away to a large extent. Or,
returning to the prodigal son similitude, the son has established himself
firmly, and it no longer matters whether his parents disown him or not. No
longer dependent on them, he now exerts his influence upon them.
In the course of history, Jews in the diaspora have allowed
their religious identification as the people of the Torah to be eroded and
replaced by a racial identification of the Jewish people. This racial
perception of themselves strengthened the occult Kabbalistic elements within
their ranks, for whom blood and racial purity have always been more important
than scripture. Jews no longer represented a faith but became a nation, and,
arguably, a nation needed a state. To the disappointment of nostalgics like
Neturei Karta, this nation state could dispense with the need for a future
messiah. All that mattered was the here and now.
Because of the indifference of Jews around the world to the
abuses by those who claim to represent them, Zionism has grown out of control
like a cancer which is not being reigned in by religious exponents of Judaism
(nor by the Western powers who sponsored its growth). If Judaism really wants
to be universal and humane and wants to be respected as different to its Zionist
offshoot, then non-Zionist Jews must stop turning a blind eye and replace their
complacent toleration of Israel’s excesses with a clear denunciation of
Israel’s racism as having no place in their midst. This does not necessarily
mean the need to call for Israel as a state and political entity having to be
dismantled, but would require support for a single-state solution where each
citizen, Jewish or not, has identical civil rights and duties. Obviously, this
means the end of a purely Jewish state in reality and its transformation into
an ordinary secular state with Jewish roots. Those who find this anathema
support the myth of Jewish supremacy and, in spite of their protestations, can
only be described as covert Zionists.
[Originally published in "Blood and Shekels" edited by Troy Southgate, Black Front Press 2018]
[2]
http://www.nkusa.org/AboutUs/Zionism/opposition.cfm
accessed 03/05/2015
[4]
http://www.rense.com/general84/divisions.htm
accessed 03/05/2015
[5]
http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2009/09/uri-avnery-against-the-israeli-boycott/
accessed 03/05/2015
[6]
For an extensive expose of the British origins of Zionism see Mark Burdman, How
Britain’s Biggest Racists and Financiers Created Zionism, https://archive.org/stream/HowBritainsBiggestRacistsAndFinanciersCreatedZionism-ByMarkBurdman/HowBritainsBiggestRacistsAndFinanciersCreatedZionism-ByMarkBurdman_djvu.txt
accessed 3/05/2015
[7]
David Pidcock, Satanic Voices Ancient and Modern, Mustaqim 1992
[8]
Francis Nicosia, Zionism and Anti-Semitism in Nazi Germany, Cambridge
University Press 2008; Joseph Massad, Zionism, anti-Semitism and colonialism http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2012/12/201212249122912381.html
accessed 3/05/2015; Zionism is also responsible for destroying the mostly
amicable relationships between Jewish and Arab communities in the Muslim world,
in some documented cases even by orchestrating terror against Jews, such as the
1950 Baghdad bombing campaign designed to get Iraqi Jews to migrate to Israel,
see “Jews in the Arab World” in http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/03/zionism-and-anti-semitism/#identifier_18_42824
accessed 4/05/2015
[9]
Ralph
Schoenman, The Hidden History of Zionism, Veritas Press 1988
[10]
Livingstone & Bleher, Surrendering Islam, Mustaqim 2010
[11]
Leah Garrett, A Knight at the Opera: Heine, Wagner, Herzl, Peretz and the
legacy of Der Tannhäuser, Purdue University Press 2011; http://thinkclassical.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/is-wagner-spiritual-father-of-zionism.html
accessed 3/05/2015
[12]
cf. Ben Hecht, Perfidy, 1961; reprinted by Milah Press, Jerusalem, in 1997
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home