Saturday, May 13, 2006

British Immigration use Racial Profiling


After ex-home secretary Charles Clarke's blunder with regard to not keeping track of released foreign prisoners, the immigration department have stepped up their activity. As with police stop and search actions, the Muslim community is to bear the brunt of it through the process of racial profiling. Here is an example of a recent raid where ordinary members of the public were held hostage by police and immigration officers.

At just after 20.00 hours on 11 May 2006 a total of 7 uniformed officers from the immigration service and police entered the premises of Chicken & Pizza Zone, a take-away restaurant in Netherfield, Milton Keynes, and whilst permitting customers of non-Asian origin to leave the premises refused the same privilege to those who looked Asian. Approximately 45 minutes passed before the first customer was permitted to leave. People's identity documents were taken and checked by mobile phone, they were not informed of any rights, they were not given access to a solicitor or to an interpreter; no paperwork was issued afterwards to confirm that a detention had taken place. In my view the law enforcement agencies clearly broke the law.

My understanding of article 130 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999 is that immigration may enter and search premises without a search  warrant only to look for a specific individual they suspect of having broken  and law and where they have reasonable cause to believe that the individual  may be present there. This does not give them the right to detain and deprive of their freedom other people, especially when it becomes apparent to them from their identity papers that they are not the specific individuals  sought. I cannot imagine immigration raiding a McDonalds branch and closing it down for almost an hour, nor can I imagine them  holding all white-skinned people because they might be looking for an individual from Eastern Europe.

I telephoned the responsible immigration authority on 01234 821600 and asked to speak to their press officer about the "immigration raid" and was told by the switchboard operator, after taking down my details  and press credentials, that she was only willing to tell me that they did not do "immigration raids" but only "enforcement visits" and that they were not prepared to talk to any media; instead a written request for information would have to be made to the home office. So much for "open government".

11 Comments:

At 17 May 2006 at 16:33, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sahib Mustaqim

as a pilot could you give me your professional opinion about the skill required as a pilot needed to fly a Boeing 757-200 into the Pentagon?

Is it possible?

 
At 18 May 2006 at 13:00, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey!

You don't have to be a pilot to answer your question. You need to be a magician. Who else can transform a Boeing 757 into a Bunker Buster Missile which flies in at over 500 miles and just five feet off the ground. Who else can make the 757 dissapear before and after the impact and who else empty the jets fuel tanks seconds before impact leaving unburnt books and furniture at the scene.

It takes an even bigger magician to arange for the "clean up" to be done by Pentagon officials rather than the usual emergency crews.

 
At 22 May 2006 at 14:43, Anonymous Anonymous said...

All muslims are not terrorist, but all terrorist are muslim. So stop searching little white granny and look under the burka on the muslim!

 
At 24 May 2006 at 14:11, Anonymous Anonymous said...

wow brain washing in the media really does work.. i can't believe someone actually believes that all terrorists are muslims.

The only reason you think all terrorists are muslim because of what the media reports.. what about the tamil tigers or ETA? these are active terrorist organisations with no affiliation to Islam. The tamil tigers were the pioneers of suicide bombings??

i feel sorry for you, you need to open your eyes to the reality of this world and see what is really going on...

 
At 24 May 2006 at 15:31, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh wow! You could only name two non-muslim religious groups terrorizing the world. Of the two dozen major armed conflicts around the world, over 90% of them have muslims involved. Coincidence? I think not! The reality of this world is islam is not a religion of peace. It is a religion of war and submission. It is a religion that believes once a piece of land is occupied by a muslim, it must be forever muslim. All people who are not muslim are treated as inferior people. Women are not treated as equals. Shall I go on? There have been over 5,000 terrorist attacks since 9/11. How many attacks have been done in this same time in the name of Jesus? The only brain washing in this world is the brain washing work completed by the koran. Sure, not all terrorists are muslim, but when almost all of them are muslim, it's not hard to make the conclusion that something is way with the way islam is practiced.

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/index_files/Tehran-stoning.jpg

 
At 24 May 2006 at 15:44, Blogger Mustaqim said...

This reminds me of the guy in "Goodness Gracious Me" who claims everything to be "Indian", just replace with Muslims and get going:

French Revolution - Muslim
First World War - Muslim
Stalin - Muslim
Mussolini - Muslim
Hitler - Muslim
Hiroshima bomb - Muslim
Khmer Rouge - Muslim
Pol Pot - Muslim
Stern Gang / Irgun - Muslim
Bader-Meinhof - Muslim
ETA - Muslim
IRA - Muslim
Ulster Freedom Fighters - Muslim
Tamil Tigers - Muslim

I think you can carry playing the game yourself from here, and don't forget, that Muslims also assinated Lincoln and Kennedy. Wouldn't the world be docile without them.

 
At 24 May 2006 at 16:21, Anonymous Anonymous said...

By not addressing the points I made about islam and muslims, do you agree that they are true? Do you defend these muslims that stone women and sacrifice their own lives to blow up innocent people in the name of your god, including muslims? Would you like me to list all of the muslim groups who have killed in the name of your god? By creating this list, you only prove that you are unable to defend the actions of your fellow believers who kill innocents.

BTW, Kennedy was killed by a muslim. Sirhan Bishara Sirhan was not a Christian!

How long before you ban me or try and have me killed?

 
At 24 May 2006 at 16:48, Blogger Mustaqim said...

I was talking about John, not Robert; but here is what the Wikipedia has about your guy:
"Sirhan was born to Palestinian parents in Jerusalem. Though he is commonly thought to have been a Muslim, he was raised a Christian. However, in his adult years he frequently changed his religious thoughts, to Baptist, Seventh-day Adventist, and Rosicrucianism."
It seems a Christian upbringing can be a very dangerous thing, and with you expressing a death-wish in your last comment you must have had one of those, lol. But if you're feeling a bit suicidal at the moment, don't be a coward by asking some Muslim to do the job for you.
As for the Christian "respect" for women, St. Tertullian called women "the devil's gateway", St. Thomas Aquinas called them "defective and misbegotten", Martin Luther said: "Let them die in childbirth, that's why they are there", and this is what Paul wrote in his letters: "As in all the congregations of the saints, women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak but must remain in submission, as the Law says."
Now you must really feel depressed.

 
At 24 May 2006 at 17:38, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The difference between Christianity and islam is Christians don't practice the Bible word for word as the muslims do the koran. In the past hundred years of modern civilazation, who has treated women more equally, Christians or muslims?

Sura 4:34: "Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other."

Sura 4:34: "Men stand superior to women in that God hath preferred the one over the other ... Those whose perverseness you fear, admonish them and remove them into bed chambers and beat them, but if they submit to you then do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great."

4.11 Allah enjoins you concerning your children: The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females

4.15 And as for those who are guilty of an indecency from among your women, call to witnesses against them four (witnesses) from among you; then if they bear witness confine them to the houses until death takes them away or Allah opens some way for them

I could go on forever... I could also go on forever with examples of this treatment by muslim men to women. I could show you more pictures of the religion of peace in action if you would like?

Where are your Christian examples???

 
At 26 May 2006 at 18:07, Blogger Mustaqim said...

I have removed the comment posting a link to the video clip submission by Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Ironic that you should post this in support of your alleged mistreatment of Muslim women when all she ever wanted was to stir up hatred and friction in order to generate a backlash against Muslims. Of course, by now she has been exposed as a fraud who entered Holland illegally under false pretenses, but she has been handsomely rewarded for the job she has done by the Americans who are more than happy to have her on board on the American Enterprise Institute, a neocon think tank in cohorts with the Bush administration.

 
At 30 May 2006 at 10:24, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oh Mr Mustaqim you missed Bush, Blair and thier puppets from your list. After all does not Bush claim to recieve instructions directly from his God ?
And Blair was told by his God to invade Iraq thereby killing an un acounted number of civilians in order to creat another military base and steal the countries resources and to manufacture huge reconstruction contracts. As part of thier crusade which they quickly re named "war on terror" These two have and continue to commit large scale mass murder. The worst that could happen to them is impeachment when they ought to be judged for war crimes and be put away for life.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home