Monday, May 02, 2011

Did Osama kill Obama?

The news that Qaddafi's son and three grandchildren were killed in a bomb raid in Tripoli was soon eclipsed by the announcement that Osama bin Laden had been found, killed in combat and quickly buried at sea, some seven hundred miles away, and thus not the most obvious choice of burial location unless you wanted to hide something. But these days, journalists don't ask difficult questions anymore, and the world media were full with world leaders grasping the opportunity to sound jubilant and reassert their unswerving loyalty to America and the so-called war on terror. That war, we are told, is not dead with Osama, but likely to be intensified. Al-Qaeda, by now having outdone even McDonald's as a true American brand name, lives on and the soap opera continues.

For a soap opera it is, and bin Laden, one of the main actors, had eventually to be written out of the script, since he no longer participated in any of the episodes and his occasional appearances by audio or video tape lacked the credibility of the real actor in the flesh. The war on terror needs its success stories, and tracking down, confronting and eradicating bin Laden fits the bill perfectly. It also puts to rest the pertinent questions about the whereabouts of the absent actor. Happy with the "mission accomplished" statement, there is no longer any need to speculate about the frail man on a dialysis machine who could not possibly have survived the aerial bombardment at the start of the Afghan war hiding out in a cave in Tora Bora.

Does it matter? Actors change and the show goes on. Now and then a "radical" Muslim youth guilty of the equivalent of the pub banter that those in authority "all ought to be shot" and that "he'd be the first send them to hell" gets arrested, as recently in Germany, proof that terrorism is alive and kicking although incapable of going beyond the stage of wishful thinking, possibly helped by a good measure of entrapment from the security services. When this doesn't suffice and people stop tuning into the series, something more dramatic gets orchestrated to attract the crowds back to the set: a real explosion in a place where security is easy to evade, for example Marrakesh. The entrance roads to all major Moroccan towns now sport police check points where police do exactly what their Western counterparts do: cash in on the suffering of ordinary people. In Morocco they specialise in taking bribes of motorists (akin to the use of speed cameras in the West), whereas in Europe and America they sell expensive body scanners.

Incidentally, amongst the innocent victims of the carnage in Marrakesh was an Israeli who lived in Shanghai and visited his relatives in Morocco for Passover, putting paid to the lie that Jews (at least those who were not persuaded by the Zionists to migrate to Israel) could not live peacefully amongst their Muslim neighbours in Arab countries. But who pays notice to the facts? Who goes back to the original 9/11 videos and wonders how comes that airoplanes made from lightweight metal penetrate undamaged through buildings made from concrete and heavy steel, melting into the structure and even popping out the other side? It does not matter whether the attack happened as presented on the television screens, what matters for the ordinary viewer is who ordered it, and since Osama has now sunk to the bottom of the sea, the good guys have finally regained the upper hand again in this cops and robbers show. Two questions are never asked (or allowed to ask): who wrote the original script and who benefits from the outcome?

Since the war on terror is mainly fought in the media, anything goes. New wars can now be fought without a declaration of war upon the spurious excuse that we must protect rebels who want to overthrow their government against the repercussions from the the machine of state. By that logic America should have supported the IRA aforetime against the British government who did not willingly give in to their demands. Or the Palestinians against Israel, for that matter, but for sympathy for the underdog to go quite that far is, of course, unthinkable.

Sadly, the people are always the losers. Playing on their hopes of real democracy and fears of terror and violence, the world is being restructured. European countries are turning into police states in order to deal with the expected disquiet over the economic meltdown caused by fraudulent bank created credit. Sudan is partitioned in order to put an end to the war over the oil fields found at the disputed border line. Egypt retains a military government but is given a secular, rather than Islamic, constitution. American stooges who willingly agree to be written out of the script are rewarded with a gracious pension, from Idi Amin to Husni Mubarak. Those who refuse and want to carry on playing a major role, are punished severely, such as Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi. And with some, the script writers had simply forgotten to carry on their story, so Osama, long since dead, had to be publicly killed once more to achieve closure. Maybe Obama, having only just recently released his own birth certificate after many years of agonising hesitation, can now proceed to fake his near namesake's death certificate.


At 3 May 2011 at 14:52, Anonymous F.J. Adam said...

" comes that airoplanes made from lightweight metal penetrate undamaged through buildings made from concrete and heavy steel, melting into the structure and even popping out the other side?"
Dear Mustqim, I am a German too with the difference that I flew one third of a century for a big airline and before that four years in the USAF.
In your statement, which I quoted above, you displayed a certain amount of innocence regarding kinetic energy and the construction of skyscrapers. The latter are about 95% open space inside the buildings, therefore it is quite possible for the heavy parts of an aircraft, engines, landing gear etc. to punch their way through the building. And fuel may not burn hot enough to melt steel, but certainly is hot enough to weaken the structure sufficiently to allow the enormous supported weight above to come crashing down. Once that is initiated, the rest takes place as shown on numerous videos.
Otherwise you are doing a great job, so keep up the good work.

At 3 May 2011 at 15:11, Blogger Mustaqim said...

FJA, please take a good look at the few videos available showing planes going into the buildings. If you only taxied your aircraft into a ramp on the ground, never mind flew it at high speed into a building, the nose would crumble and the aircraft sustain significant damage. Take a look at the damage caused by hailstones alone. Now in those pictures, amazingly, the aircraft enters the building completely unscathed and even emerges with the noise intact at the other side. That footage must have been edited, because it is simply impossible to drive a plane through a building like that!

At 3 May 2011 at 21:03, Anonymous Anonymous said...


Does anybody have answers to the below?

(1) Did anyone see the dead body?

(2) Who washed the body and prayed Janazah?

(3) The continuation of the targeted killing policy shows a continuation of the law of war logic against Terrorism. This is Bush policy at its best. Peace Nobel Prize for Obama, really?

(4) What happened to due process?

(5) What happened to OBL's wife and children?

At 4 May 2011 at 06:54, Blogger Unknown said...

Who really gives a fuck! Just be thankful that your alive. When so many people have lost their lives, in this bullshit, that makes no sience. I'm so sick of people dieing at the hands of other humans, and that's the bottom line. Who cares who is in the soap.Just tell me when it goes off the air for good.

At 4 May 2011 at 13:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Majority of the people loosing their lives are MUSLIMS and at is at the hands of US+UK+EU

SO I care and a great deal.

Why don't you keep the war criminals busy +Blair bush cameron sarko, merko and the rest of the terrorist state so that the rest of us can leave our lives without the bastards

At 4 May 2011 at 18:24, Anonymous Riaz said...

Has anybody got concrete evidence that Bin Laden was alive some time in 2011? If he was still alive until recently them somebody outside of the government / military must have known of his existence. Reports from 2001 stated that he had kidney problems that required dialysis. Have any dialysis machines been found in the compound? Who were his medics?

The silence from these individuals is just as deafening as that from the US government.

At 6 May 2011 at 19:50, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Obomba is playing the "house nigger" and the 40 thieves of Bagdad are tthe same old thugs.

Have you noticed the dialysis, health problems etc have all been put aside especially by britshiter media and the only thing keeping the BS is western media.

I wonder what medical staff he had to keep going all this time

At 7 May 2011 at 03:10, Anonymous Slave of God said...

Peace to my brother Mustaqim!
Jews have lived amongst the Muslims, unmolested, for thousands of years.

"Arab Palestinian Christians and Arab Palestinian Muslims lived side by side for the past 1400 years, and for anybody to say that the Arab Palestinian Christians have been persecuted recently by Muslims is absolutely another big lie, like the big lie that spoke of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq."
Riah Abu El-Assal, Christian Bishop of Jerusalem

The unknown facts, unknown because the Media Bosses who are Jewish in USA and also in Canada and to what extent in UK you would know best, do not permit any discussion in the so-called mainstream media of what 9-11 was about and who orchestrated it. Instead the masses are fed propaganda, and truly, this world has become Orwellian to an extent that is, indeed, most disturbing.

This was the frontpage story the day before 9-11:

U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army study
by Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times September 10, 2001
Edition: 2 Section: A Pages: A1, 9.

Of the MOSSAD, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."
December 8, 2003
Did Al Qaeda shoot recently released footage of 9/11 WTC attack – or was it someone else?
by Justin Raimondo
So who else just happened to be videotaping the World Trade Center attack that day?

Hours after the terrorists struck, five people were arrested in New Jersey as they taped the WTC from their vantage point across the Hudson River in New Jersey. A witness identified only as "Maria" by ABC News said she saw:

"Three young men kneeling on the roof of a white van in the parking lot of her apartment building. 'They seemed to be taking a movie,' Maria said. The men were taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center burning in the background, she said.

"What struck Maria were the expressions on the men's faces. 'They were like happy, you know … They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange,' she said."

Even stranger – it turned out the five were Israelis. When law enforcement swooped down on this crew, they found them in possession of $4,700 in cash, box cutters, and multiple foreign passports. Police dogs reacted as if the presence of explosives was indicated, and, as the Bergen County Record reported:

"Sources close to the investigation said they found other evidence linking the men to the bombing plot. 'There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted,' the source said. 'It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at Liberty State Park.'"

OBL was innocent of the charges that he had anything to do with 9-11 and he died by Bunker Buster US bomb in Kandahar on December 13th 2001


Post a Comment

<< Home